From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat Aug 10 20:08:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA04573 for emulation-outgoing; Sat, 10 Aug 1996 20:08:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co ([200.21.26.198]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id UAA04552; Sat, 10 Aug 1996 20:07:59 -0700 (PDT) From: pgiffuni@biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co Received: from localhost by biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA15382; Sat, 10 Aug 1996 22:15:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Aug 1996 22:15:36 -0500 (CDT) To: Greg Lehey Cc: emulation@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO cross compiler In-Reply-To: <199608110211.TAA00613@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 10 Aug 1996, Greg Lehey wrote: > > It's difficult to use the original compiler if you don't have one, and > they're not cheap. Somewhere I have a complete GNU development > environment which I built some time ago, and which I could package up > if anybody's interested. It includes the GNU C library, fixed to work > with SCO. I'll see if I can download it cheaply enough (Internet > access costs me an arm and a leg). > Don't worry about it (downloading it), I used SCO before I found FreeBSD and I know the original development tools are expensive and are not really useful... boy I would have liked to enjoy all fbsd ports then... My question is..SCO's gcc runs under FreeBSD ? It would be cool to have an optional binary compatibility both ways. Pedro. > >