Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 10:11:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>, "James D. Butt 'J.D" <jbutt@mwci.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, danny <danny@pentalpha.com.hk> Subject: Re: cvsup problem in 3.1 stable Message-ID: <19990512101152.A31956@nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990512122402.jobaldwi@vt.edu>; from John Baldwin on Wed, May 12, 1999 at 12:24:02PM -0400 References: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9905121033490.24659-100000@boom.firecracker.com> <XFMail.990512122402.jobaldwi@vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It became -BETA Sunday, AFAIK, and the release is scheduled for > Saturday.. (U.S days). It is -BETA so that 1) all the pre-built > packages on the CD have 3.2 in them, and 2) it gives a week for -stable > users to beat it to death to try and find bugs before release. AFAIK, > no new features are allowed during -BETA, only bugfixes. VERY correct. Also by calling it "BETA" hopefully users will know this is their last chance to let us know of any show stoppers before the release. In general the version goes like this: 3.1-RELEAES --> 3.1-STABLE --> 3.2-BETA --> 3.2-RELEASE --> 3.2-STABLE P.S. Another need for "3.2-BETA" for a period of time is to let port maintainers make sure their ports will build under "3.2". My own LSOF for instance didn't recognize "FreeBSD 3.2" and thus this period of time gave me time to fix it before the code freeze. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990512101152.A31956>