From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 17 11:25:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E38937B400; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from topperwein.dyndns.org (acs-24-154-28-203.zoominternet.net [24.154.28.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF7343E31; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:25:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from topperwein (topperwein [192.168.168.10]) by topperwein.dyndns.org (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6HIPDxQ025730; Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:25:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 14:25:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: Chris BeHanna To: FreeBSD-Stable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SGI's STL (Standard Template Library) in base system? In-Reply-To: <20020717153407.GA1646@Deadcell.ant> Message-ID: <20020717142017.W24970-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: > Hello list, > Maybe I should be posting this to -hackers, but I'll try anyway. > > Is the Standard Template Library somehow contained in the base > system of FreeBSD? I know there is the ports devel/stlport, but if The GCC STL is in the base system. I've had problems with thread-safe allocators in the GCC 2.95 version. I haven't tried it in the 3.x series. > it also resides in the base system (just like sendmail, perl, ssh, > etc..) it would be no good idea to install it from ports, would it? The port will install into /usr/local/include/stlport. There should be no worries, but you'll have to add -nostdinc++ -I/usr/local/include/stlport to your CXXFLAGS to use the stlport version. > But if I have to install the port, is it any good? Is it useable? My experience with it was on Solaris, and it was quite good indeed. There are some Koenig lookup issues when building older versions of Crypto++ against it, but the current versions should play happily together. -- Chris BeHanna http://www.pennasoft.com Principal Consultant PennaSoft Corporation chris@pennasoft.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message