From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 16:34:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA00188 for java-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 16:34:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from main.brewich.com (USR2-1.detnet.com [207.113.12.31] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA00120 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 16:33:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gclarkii@main.brewich.com) Received: (from gclarkii@localhost) by main.brewich.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA03454; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 18:32:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from gclarkii) From: "Gary B. Clark II" Message-Id: <199801080032.SAA03454@main.brewich.com> Subject: Re: Motif question To: hasty@rah.star-gate.com (Amancio Hasty) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 18:32:27 -0600 (CST) Cc: jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au, nate@mt.sri.com, dap@damon.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199801072311.PAA01999@rah.star-gate.com> from Amancio Hasty at "Jan 7, 98 03:11:39 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Amancio Hasty wrote: --SNIP-- > > Also, not sure what to attribute it to however my "native" compiled > version of jdk1.1.5 with motif seems to run faster than the distributed > jdk with lesstif. On that thought, Would it be legal to distribute a compleate JDK minus motif? Then those of us with Motif could just copy it into place? Or are most versions linked with motif and lesstif just put into place? > Amancio Gary