From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 17:49:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE3F12C1 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA80D8E for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id i7so12178966oag.34 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:49:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bluelife.at; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=v33+XBSmIrrX4rUnzGCspMQnf2THBDSTlWEAOzIGF2k=; b=GgcsFneukQL7A2TDJgkQV/mwHNC7Z9qVQ4Xz1IErNY0wp16Ihx4DnDgeZ78tVSEpBO 3cBOyOoOHZeHb7NCJinHP9Y4ZDTc936GW2+iI7YrnQ2wrdChCzYz/fSApQITs+zjssyQ 0Z9/R6ZYPgTe9IH9MyMNtTkU80Izr4uFAWucg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v33+XBSmIrrX4rUnzGCspMQnf2THBDSTlWEAOzIGF2k=; b=a2Eovn6ye5FJVVbUkFfdIUyGSGl3dQuihJfgT+EVbVcT0oG5bV7aKJk6NmSYETI0X5 7mVCCL5wWGplG5jZNAqY85GbSwnt89100kWCI4rTDV7y8dQMnCPkoCzwKjRLZxZePSB5 KAYx3mRn2a97yTOTtKPYibzXSrm9nNis4DEslTE8KCM3KgpuUxfvwXnoxXgiAy7qOH+/ Fb5lEWoQ+0fwR5IGcx+Q1kcRBZbUPN0JgR3Fc5k3EZiZZZUrquO4xqsZVvKlAClq6KZo vmGlLJ6N+i1NIcXVhnNX1Z1Gex016de14PthseDIYO9PgeUWJX1h75yH6d8XAcRJsnqW ZvGw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnYLl643ZLQ3LcZyEO4szchT6QhPcZ0Gc4mPWgOfeTson7IxUO60XZZe7gs/ag0MfxhsPZX MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.176.138 with SMTP id ci10mr41073836oec.55.1410284969471; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.141.136 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:49:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [212.95.7.136] Received: by 10.76.141.136 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 10:49:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 19:49:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [QAT] 367736: 4x fail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Fr=C3=B6hlich?= To: Sunpoet Hsieh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "ports@freebsd.org Ports" , Ports-QAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 17:49:31 -0000 Am 09.09.2014 17:07 schrieb "Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh" : > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Ports-QAT wrote: >> >> - Update to 0.005 >> >> Changes: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Return-Type/Changes >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Build ID: 20140909144400-60289 >> Job owner: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org >> Buildtime: 5 minutes >> Enddate: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:48:32 GMT >> >> Revision: 367736 >> Repository: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=367736 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Port: devel/p5-Return-Type 0.005 >> >> Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/amd64 >> Buildstatus: FAIL >> >> Buildgroup: 8.4-QAT/i386 >> Buildstatus: FAIL >> >> Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/amd64 >> Buildstatus: FAIL >> >> Buildgroup: 9.2-QAT/i386 >> Buildstatus: FAIL >> >> >> -- >> Buildarchive URL: < https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140909144400-60289> >> redports > > > I did not find build logs on https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/20140909144400-60289 > Where can I get the logs of failed builds to investigate the problem? > Thanks. > > Regards, > sunpoet This kind of failure does not create any buildlogs. It happens when an internal error on QAT happens or some serious dependency issue like circular dependencies or non existing dependency. So I would recommend to ignore that mail right now.