From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 21:16:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFC716A4CE; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:16:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4766B43D54; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iA3LGCqw077598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:16:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id iA3LGCKX077595; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:16:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:16:12 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200411032116.iA3LGCKX077595@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: References: X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:16:14 -0000 < said: > If the information provided by "route monitor" isn't sufficiently useful > and detailed (i.e., easily parsable) we should make it more useful, I > think. Why can't we simply log() a message? -GAWollman