From owner-freebsd-current Thu Aug 6 10:26:27 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA13636 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:26:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA13610 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:26:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) From: sthaug@nethelp.no Received: (qmail 17168 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Aug 1998 17:26:00 +0000 (GMT) To: mike@smith.net.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New bootstrap config file(s) (Re: booting with verbosity by default? ) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 06 Aug 1998 08:44:07 -0700" References: <199808061544.IAA03196@antipodes.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 19:26:00 +0200 Message-ID: <17166.902424360@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > And this is a handy topic to raise it under; the new bootstrap will > (optionally) need access to quite a few files, and we may not really > want these cluttering up the root directory. How do people feel about > a /boot directory these days? Yes, please. Reducing clutter in / is a good thing. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message