From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 21 08:15:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1AB1065672 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2638FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdq11 with SMTP id dq11so5267419wgb.31 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:15:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.68 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.107.68; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.107.68]) by 10.180.107.68 with SMTP id ha4mr9514066wib.9.1329812137990 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:15:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.107.68 with SMTP id ha4mr7878586wib.9.1329812137949; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:15:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h19sm20874643wiw.9.2012.02.21.00.15.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:15:37 -0800 (PST) References: <376001325.20120220220651@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <376001325.20120220220651@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <6A522128-E07D-46E4-B6B5-10C1F91CEE43@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:14:56 +0100 To: =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4DfkRdVWgS8L4hc+dJfzNYDgGKfN4II/i6aEGJATTmTVfffnVUD3TCHPUKzrtoRZ1BWUi Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: deleting an alias from interface cause the static route to be deleted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:15:39 -0000 On 20 Feb 2012, at 21:06, =D0=9A=D0=BE=D0=BD=D1=8C=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2 =D0=95=D0= =B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9 wrote: >=20 > vlan74: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1= 500 > options=3D3 > ether f4:6d:04:7c:7b:d3 > inet6 fe80::f66d:4ff:fe7c:7bd3%vlan74 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xd > inet 10.1.26.1 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 > inet 10.1.26.3 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 10.1.27.255 > nd6 options=3D29 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active > vlan: 74 parent interface: re0 >=20 > ifconfig vlan74 delete 10.1.26.1 >=20 > will delete these static routes from route table: >=20 > 10.3.0.1 10.7.26.2 UGHS 8 367 vlan74 > 10.1.6.0/23 10.7.26.2 UGS 275 166969 vlan74 >=20 > Does this a bug? >=20 I don't know if it's a bug or intended, but I do know you should use /32 ali= ases for additional IPs, not your original netmask.=