From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 29 17:24:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.force9.co.uk [195.166.136.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58A914D91 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 17:24:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@lan.awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id CAA90251; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 02:23:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@lan.awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA04906; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 02:23:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199903300123.CAA04906@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: tront@cs.sfu.ca Cc: jonc@pinnacle.co.nz, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: natd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:58:16 -0800." <3.0.3.32.19990329095816.009f5960@cs.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 02:23:04 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Does anyone know if the following is commonly required to run natd. The > natd man page says nothing about this particular kernel option being needed. > > >Another person has suggested using: > >>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy > >This fixed his non-function natd. This is not mentioned in the natd man [.....] It wasn't required last time I looked. -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message