From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 10 14:56: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from guru.mired.org (okc-65-26-235-186.mmcable.com [65.26.235.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8729C37B422 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:55:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 43485 invoked by uid 100); 10 Apr 2001 21:55:49 -0000 From: Mike Meyer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15059.33125.707948.129365@guru.mired.org> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:55:49 -0500 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Releases In-Reply-To: <20010410144804.B20548@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20010409111527V.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010410144804.B20548@hub.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David O'Brien types: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 06:32:15AM +1200, Dan Langille wrote: > > AFAIK, the thread to date has been about whether or not [something like] > > the label "-development" would cause less confusion than "-current". My > And then we'd have people who CVSup'ed -development because they wanted > to develop an application on FreeBSD. Clearly, the solution is rename -CURRENT to be -BETA. That should keep the clueless from grabbing it by accident. http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message