From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Oct 9 23:19:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from puck.firepipe.net (mcut-b-167.resnet.purdue.edu [128.211.209.167]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC1C37B66C for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 23:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by puck.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B427D1908; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 01:19:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 01:19:42 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Warner Losh Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: portlint bad, or did I make a bad commit? Message-ID: <20001010011942.U1067@puck.firepipe.net> Reply-To: Will Andrews Mail-Followup-To: Will Andrews , Warner Losh , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200010100530.XAA23104@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010100530.XAA23104@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:30:03PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:30:03PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > cd /usr/ports/net/socks5 > portlint | grep -v OK > FATAL: extra item "PORTREVISION" placed in the PORTNAME section. > WARN: no MASTER_SITES found. is it ok? > 1 fatal errors and 1 warnings found. > > The MASTER_SITES part is right, but if PORTREVISION doesn't belong in > the PORTNAME section, where does it belong? Portlint tends to lag behind things lately. Sorry. -- Will Andrews - Physics Computer Network wench The Universal Answer to All Problems - "It has something to do with physics." -- Comic on door of Room 240, Physics Building, Purdue University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message