From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 22 18:26:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1727316A4CE
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:26:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A1A43D3F
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:26:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl)
Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018)
	id 30D07347121; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:29:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 19:29:12 +0100
From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20041122182912.GA33296@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
Subject: Large NAT: ipf/ipnat, pf - opinions?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:26:47 -0000

Hello,

	I'm interested in opinions/comparisons how ipnat and pf perform
on FreeBSD 5.x in real working large NAT setups (about 50Mbit/s, few
thousands of workstations, 300k of mappings or more). Problems noticed,
memory and CPU consumption, mbufs utilization etc.


TIA,
-- 
Paweł Małachowski