From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Nov 18 07:31:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA29176 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 07:31:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from firewall.ftf.dk (root@mail.ftf.dk [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA29162 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 07:31:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) Received: from mail.prosa.dk ([192.168.100.2]) by firewall.ftf.dk (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA16946; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 18:06:02 +0100 Received: from deepo.prosa.dk (deepo.prosa.dk [192.168.100.10]) by mail.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) with ESMTP id QAA09466; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:51:49 +0100 (CET) Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) id QAA08968; Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:30:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <19971118163000.24023@deepo.prosa.dk> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 16:30:00 +0100 From: Philippe Regnauld To: Scot Elliott Cc: akl@wup.de, amr@wup.de, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RIP vs. OSPF References: <19971118133310.04039@wup.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: ; from Scot Elliott on Tue, Nov 18, 1997 at 02:27:58PM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Scot Elliott writes: > Thei only thing I'd say about RIP is that it doesn't support subnetting. RIP v2 does. -- -- Phil -[ Philippe Regnauld / Systems Administrator / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk ]- -[ Location.: +55.4N +11.3E PGP Key: finger regnauld@hotel.prosa.dk ]-