From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 23 11:46:45 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E2016A4DD
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:46:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A3B43D45
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:46:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D7720A5;
	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:41 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on tim.des.no
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10622084;
	Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 7522933C24; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net>
	<002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> <86hd0423zk.fsf@xps.des.no>
	<44EB302A.7010106@rsu.ru>
	<20060823121157.yawh6f8e844w4osc@netchild.homeip.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20060823121157.yawh6f8e844w4osc@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander
	Leidinger's message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:11:57 +0200")
Message-ID: <86u043znbz.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net>,
	Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru>
Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and
	more (SoC)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:46:45 -0000

Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes:
> Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru> writes:(from Tue, 22 Aug 2006
> > So, after all, I'd prefer to leave libldap (and nss_ldap, which can
> > also conflict with PADL's nss_ldap) as is and let users use
> > WITHOUT_LDAP and WITHOUT_NSS_LDAP when appropriate.
> If someone doesn't like the base system libldap, but wants the
> nss_ldap stuff, this way will not work out. While building the base
> system, no 3rd party libs are known to the build infrastructure.

Wrong.  It is already possible in today's tree to build the base
system's Kerberos with OpenLDAP support using the OpenLDAP port, and
there are similar provisions for using OpenSSL from ports.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no