Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:46:40 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net>, Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) Message-ID: <86u043znbz.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20060823121157.yawh6f8e844w4osc@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:11:57 %2B0200") References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> <86hd0423zk.fsf@xps.des.no> <44EB302A.7010106@rsu.ru> <20060823121157.yawh6f8e844w4osc@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> writes: > Michael Bushkov <bushman@rsu.ru> writes:(from Tue, 22 Aug 2006 > > So, after all, I'd prefer to leave libldap (and nss_ldap, which can > > also conflict with PADL's nss_ldap) as is and let users use > > WITHOUT_LDAP and WITHOUT_NSS_LDAP when appropriate. > If someone doesn't like the base system libldap, but wants the > nss_ldap stuff, this way will not work out. While building the base > system, no 3rd party libs are known to the build infrastructure. Wrong. It is already possible in today's tree to build the base system's Kerberos with OpenLDAP support using the OpenLDAP port, and there are similar provisions for using OpenSSL from ports. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86u043znbz.fsf>