From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 13:28:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304EA16A403; Wed, 16 May 2007 13:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FF613C468; Wed, 16 May 2007 13:28:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBEF20A7; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98E32088; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AEBD552DD; Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:08 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=) To: Alexander Leidinger References: <200705160846.l4G8kaYr074481@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070516124002.6g6ox6y28048ws4g@webmail.leidinger.net> Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:28:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070516124002.6g6ox6y28048ws4g@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed\, 16 May 2007 12\:40\:02 +0200") Message-ID: <867ir8kidz.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Makefile.inc1 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:28:13 -0000 Alexander Leidinger writes: > For the check-old target there's no reason to split up the targets, as > you can list them unconditionally. For developing convenience I did > chose to have the check-old-XXX targets in Makefile.inc1 ("make -f > Makefile.inc1 TARGET" works just fine). I see no need to expose all > targets. I see no reason not to. The fact that they were not all exposed has always confused me, I don't know how many times I've done 'make check-old-libs' and been annoyed that it didn't work. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no