Date: Sat, 9 Sep 1995 19:36:23 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: davidg@Root.COM Cc: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GUS Max support in -stable? Message-ID: <199509100136.TAA28763@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199509100023.RAA00467@corbin.Root.COM> References: <199509100009.SAA28593@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199509100023.RAA00467@corbin.Root.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I wrote: > >However, in -stable, isa/sound/local.h references 'gusmax.h' > >which is not generated by config, so I can't build a kernel with gus > >support. > > > >I've rebuilt config and *made* sure that the files I have are the > >correct -stable versions. The version of this file in -current no > >longer refernces gusmax.h, so I think we have some stuff pulled into > >-stable, but not everything for gus support. > > > >Does anyone have a GUS-Max working in -stable? David Greenman writes: > Hmmm. I haven't touched the sound code. So unless Jordan messed > with it, it should be identical to what was in 2.0.5. This is strange. This sounds rather naive, but how does config know which include files to generate? It no longer generates 'gusmax.h', and I'm not sure how it determines which include files to generate. If I comment out the need for gusmax.h in isa/sound/local.h in my -stable tree everything works great, otherwise it fails. I've looked at the code in the sound directory, and *it* hasn't changed since 2.0.5, but whatever file config uses to build the necessary kernel-specific files has changed. The solution is to either remove the need for gusmax.h in sound/local.h or put back the building of 'gusmax.h' in config. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509100136.TAA28763>