From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 14 10:09:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC08FE92; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C10BFD3; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r2EA9jWY082280; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:09:45 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r2EA9jjb082279; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:09:45 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:09:45 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Joel Dahl Subject: Re: svn commit: r248257 - head/share/man/man4 Message-ID: <20130314100945.GZ48089@FreeBSD.org> References: <201303132227.r2DMR1eo002052@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201303132227.r2DMR1eo002052@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:09:47 -0000 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:27:01PM +0000, Joel Dahl wrote: J> Author: joel (doc committer) J> Date: Wed Mar 13 22:27:01 2013 J> New Revision: 248257 J> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248257 J> J> Log: J> vinum isn't a new product. vinum is actually not present in modern FreeBSD, gvinum is. Well, the gvinum.4 page isn't written, but I strongly doubt that vinum.4 page has at least 20% of content that would precisely apply to geom_vinum module. IMO, it would be better to remove the vinum.4 page. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.