From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed May 21 20:33:54 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA27179
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 May 1997 20:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA27172
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 21 May 1997 20:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1])
	by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA03229;
	Wed, 21 May 1997 20:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705220334.UAA03229@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: "Tim Oneil" <toneil@visigenic.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Non-Intel CPUs and FreeBSD 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 May 1997 15:18:29 PDT."
             <3.0.32.19970521151828.009643a0@visigenic.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 20:34:02 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The processor is one thing however I think most of the problems 
that I have seen are more related to the PCI chipset and the 
motherboard . When ever you can go with a known motherboard
and an Intel PCI chipset.

	Amancio