From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 11:21:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95ABA16A420; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:21:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C66043D5A; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:21:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C8E46B10; Wed, 1 Feb 2006 06:21:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 11:23:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Sean McNeil In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060201112123.F57400@fledge.watson.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Daniel Eischen , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:21:46 -0000 On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote: > On Jan 31, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote: >>> >>> The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the - >>> CURRENT tree. There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason >>> for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE. IMHO, it didn't make >>> sense. >> >> I don't think it was -stable at the time. It was probably >> 6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the >> release. As a -current user, you are expected to be able >> to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary. > > This is EXACTLY what I am saying. I am not a -current user, I am a -stable > user and this happened about a week ago or so. It was libcom_err.so.2.1 > until just recently. ---------------------------- revision 1.3 date: 2005/07/22 17:18:58; author: kensmith; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 Bump the shared library version number of all libraries that have not been bumped since RELENG_5. Reviewed by: ru Approved by: re (not needed for commit check but in principle...) ---------------------------- The commit was made last year, but I'm guessing something changed last week in your local tree. The real question is what. Did you run any tools intended to sweep aside old or unused libraries? Did you upgrade across branches? Do you know about what date RELENG_6 you were running before/after your upgrade? Robert N M Watson