Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:32:41 +0100 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8-STABLE /usr/include/utmp.h and tmpx Message-ID: <BANLkTi=XPWzoc8QUWck0DG-DChDLeL6DEw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110604012313.GE1247@procyon.xvoid.org> References: <BANLkTikXRWbCqDV88=7hP0epjheKA4L_iQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimP7xBLBr-dWvJDG%2BWhcv7776y5aw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik00Osi4vgg-AMiERdVnUbHpGzenQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110604012313.GE1247@procyon.xvoid.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 June 2011 02:23, Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:16:58PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> No will do even though I don't think I have a complete enough list of >> ports to make a proper report (if in fact it is a per port solution >> vs. fixing base) > > I don't see any related commits to 8-STABLE, which commit are you > reffering to (and guessing on previous thread, such change isn't going > to be MFCed)? > > > Yuri > Main commit that might do something like that would be at [1], but there's no way that would be MFC'd. Possibly (but unlikely) the maintainers fixed their port on CURRENT but broke it in some edge way on STABLE. I'll repeat, it's unlikely that's the exact case. Chris [1] http://www.mavetju.org/mail/view_message.php?list=freebsd-current&id=3094646
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=XPWzoc8QUWck0DG-DChDLeL6DEw>