From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Jul 1 22:50: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75FF037B6DF for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 22:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA03529; Sat, 1 Jul 2000 22:50:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 22:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200007020550.WAA03529@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: bmah@cisco.com (Bruce A. Mah) Subject: Re: docs/19583: [patch] Fix typos in RELENG_4 README.TXT Reply-To: bmah@cisco.com (Bruce A. Mah) Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/19583; it has been noted by GNATS. From: bmah@cisco.com (Bruce A. Mah) To: John Baldwin Cc: bmah@cisco.com, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/19583: [patch] Fix typos in RELENG_4 README.TXT Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2000 22:46:56 -0700 --==_Exmh_1033313552P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote: > "(Bruce A. Mah)" wrote: > > >Fix: > > > > Index: README.TXT > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/src/release/texts/README.TXT,v > > retrieving revision 1.9.2.3 > > diff -c -r1.9.2.3 README.TXT > > *** README.TXT 2000/06/26 15:46:18 1.9.2.3 > > --- README.TXT 2000/06/29 16:40:35 > > *************** > > *** 32,38 **** > > getting into here (e.g. you've been following -stable) then this > > snapshot is probably for you. If you're more interested in doing > > business with FreeBSD than in playing with the cutting edge of > > ! technology, however, then 3.x or one of the 4.x releases, is almost > > certainly your best bet. > > > > Most information here is also available from the Documentation menu > > --- 32,38 ---- > > getting into here (e.g. you've been following -stable) then this > > snapshot is probably for you. If you're more interested in doing > > business with FreeBSD than in playing with the cutting edge of > > ! technology, however, then 3.x or one of the 4.x releases, is almost > > certainly your best bet. > > The changed line here should actually read as this: > > technology, however, then 3.x, or one of the 4.x releases, is almost > > or this: > > technology, however, then 3.x or one of the 4.x releases is almost > > Comments? Yep, you're right (don't show this to my old English teachers). I think the latter expresses the correct sentiments a little better, at least as how I interpret them. Thanks, Bruce. --==_Exmh_1033313552P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use MessageID: TqiSPWZIxwE8NX4iAoqFZkCIe7EA+wZP iQA/AwUBOV7XUNjKMXFboFLDEQKCKwCg1pGmFkBpNBJNIJQghHombDhTHUwAn2Gl d09ZZBlir/GQiVmGONuym/cn =M5iM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1033313552P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message