From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed May 2 10:30: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231CC37B422 for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 10:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f42HU4351943; Wed, 2 May 2001 10:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 10:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200105021730.f42HU4351943@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Eric Jacoboni Subject: Re: conf/26774: Installation of rmail, even without sendmail Reply-To: Eric Jacoboni Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR conf/26774; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eric Jacoboni To: Brian Candler Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/26774: Installation of rmail, even without sendmail Date: 02 May 2001 19:21:18 +0200 >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Candler writes: Brian> My preferred solution is therefore as follows. When building Brian> sendmail, The problem is we may need rmail without needing sendmail... As i'm using Postfix, i have NO_SENDMAIL in my make.conf hence rmail is never rebuild. My fix doesn't solve your problem but breaks the dependancy between sendmail build and rmail build (and solves the problem i've mentionned). Brian> Since many sensible mailers (e.g. exim, smail) have 'rmail' Brian> functionality already, then it becomes straightforward to Brian> change this to, say, Yep, that's perhaps another way... I've never investigated Postfix enough to see if the distribution provides a rmail replacement. -- Éric Jacoboni, né il y a 1292188590 secondes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message