From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Feb 3 06:44:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA16050 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 06:44:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mercury.webnology.com (mercury.webnology.com [209.155.51.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA16045; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 06:44:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jooji@webnology.com) Received: from localhost (jooji@localhost) by mercury.webnology.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id IAA11800; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 08:44:08 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 08:44:08 -0600 (CST) From: "Jasper O'Malley" To: ONE-MO cc: Bill Fumerola , Cy Schubert , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/9864: make rblcheck use relay.orbs.org instead of dorkslayers.com In-Reply-To: <36B788EC.CE9A808E@jps.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Redirected to -chat from -ports: On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, ONE-MO wrote: > Personally, I find this to be total BS! I understand the need for anti-spam > methods, but this is pathetic. I agree wholeheartedly. I like the RBL, because it blacklists an entire ISP. But singling out dial-up users because spammers might be running mail servers off them? That's the height of fucking stupidity. I've got a TON of clients who run full fledged mail servers for small offices with static IPs from dialup pools. Cheers, Mick The Reverend Jasper P. O'Malley dotdot:jooji@webnology.com Systems Administrator ringring:asktheadmiral Webnology, LLC woowoo:http://www.webnology.com/~jooji To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message