From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  9 00:44:18 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE03106564A
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Mon,  9 Jan 2012 00:44:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCBB8FC15
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Mon,  9 Jan 2012 00:44:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id E807956172; Sun,  8 Jan 2012 18:26:40 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:26:40 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: scheidell@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20120109002640.GA32466@lonesome.com>
References: <201201082343.q08NhlVA081796@freefall.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201201082343.q08NhlVA081796@freefall.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD@Shaneware.biz
Subject: Re: ports/163933: Update security/zenmap to same vers as nmap
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:44:18 -0000

On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 11:43:47PM +0000, scheidell@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> (ports without official maintainers tend to be ignored, and eventually dropped)

Well, only if they are broken and/or unfetchable and/or the upstream
development has stopped.  Simply being unmaintained, although a drawback,
isn't grounds for removal by itself.

mcl