Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:07:37 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, bmc@WillsCreek.COM, ust@cert.siemens.de, andrews@technologist.com, rjoseph@mammalia.org Subject: Re: sysutils/fileutils Message-ID: <20000718140737.B1464@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <200007181616.BAA25662@home.bsdclub.org>; from sada@bsdclub.org on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 01:16:37AM %2B0900 References: <20000716134043.A89318@manatee.mammalia.org> <200007181616.BAA25662@home.bsdclub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 01:16:37AM +0900, SADA Kenji wrote: > In article <20000716134043.A89318@manatee.mammalia.org> > rjoseph@mammalia.org writes: > >> I do. I use gnuls and would not want to install all of the fileutils just > >> to use it. If you do get rid of gnuls, then please create some option that > >> would allow the person using the port to decide which of the utils to install. > > How about removing gnuls from sysutils/fileutils ? This is bogus. GNU ls is part of fileutils. IMHO, there should never have been a gnuls port. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000718140737.B1464>