From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 10:38:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEFE16A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:38:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from poup.poupinou.org (poup.poupinou.org [195.101.94.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084C343D1F for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:38:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ducrot@poupinou.org) Received: from ducrot by poup.poupinou.org with local (Exim) id 1C9LYk-0004PE-00 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:38:14 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:38:14 +0200 To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040920103814.GI16132@poupinou.org> References: <20040902164219.GB29560@poupinou.org> <20040916162736.GL1047@empiric.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040916162736.GL1047@empiric.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Bruno Ducrot Subject: Re: [speedstep] testers wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:38:15 -0000 On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:27:36AM -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 06:42:19PM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote: > > I just finished a speedstep driver for p3m and p4m but it's a little bit > > ugly, and worst it would work only with ich chipsets. Even worst, I > > don't have the hardware so I can't test it. > > I'm confused here; it looks as though these functions are on the LPC bridge. Yes. > > Does this driver co-exist with the ISA bus nexus driver OK? No. That's why I say it's ugly for now. > I haven't > tested this yet. It could potentially clash with other drivers which > need to acquire resources on the same PCI function such as the Intel > TCPA stuff (from NetBSD), and of course the isab driver. I don't think it will be the case for now, because it use only actually an IO port dedicated specifiaclly to the speedstep technology. That's also why all the bus_space_???, are for now comented... Cheers, -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.