Date: Tue, 7 Nov 1995 22:44:16 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: cimaxp1!jb@werple.net.au (John Birrell) Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freebsd.org, jb@cimlogic.com.au Subject: Re: ideas from netbsd Message-ID: <199511080544.WAA19303@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199511080508.QAA16175@werple.net.au> from "John Birrell" at Nov 8, 95 04:12:37 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> My understanding of the way things are: > >> > >> NetBSD "thread environment" = CAP's pthreads code including CAP's > >> thread safe libc. > >> > >> FreeBSD "thread environment" = CAP's pthreads code including CAP's > >> thread safe libc. > > > > Your understanding is incorrect according to Julian's post under this > > same subject. > > Not it's not! What Julian mentioned is what _we_ are currently doing. > As far as 2.0 and 2.1 are concerned, pthreads is a port. > > For 2.2 I'm building a threaded libc here and feeding diffs to Julian for > inclusion in the main tree when appropriate. I'm still talking with CAP about > the integration of thread support in libc. This discussion includes Julian. I meant with regard to the NetBSD and FreeBSD sources both being based on CAP's libc code. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511080544.WAA19303>