From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 3 15:27:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1228F16A41F for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:27:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuliogs@pgt.mpt.gov.br) Received: from mail.pgt.mpt.gov.br (mail.pgt.mpt.gov.br [200.157.62.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4AA43D48 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:27:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuliogs@pgt.mpt.gov.br) Received: from [10.0.0.136] (516e.pgt.mpt.gov.br [10.0.0.136]) by mail.pgt.mpt.gov.br (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j93FR17W066990 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:27:01 -0300 (BRST) (envelope-from tuliogs@pgt.mpt.gov.br) Message-ID: <43414E22.5020302@pgt.mpt.gov.br> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:28:34 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tulio_Guimar=E3es_da_Silva?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org References: <433CCA6A.6060509@paradise.net.nz> <20050930203611.GA2071@unixpages.org> In-Reply-To: <20050930203611.GA2071@unixpages.org> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080706050203010305000906" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Support for Promise SX4060 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:27:03 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080706050203010305000906 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This chip is the same used on SX150-M, which we have here at work. In 5.4 we had no success at all with RAID, and did not try JBOD, but as far as I could get from the lists, itīs now supported on RELENG_6, except for RAID-5, but I believe itīs just a matter of time. ;) Tulio G. da Silva Christian Brueffer wrote: >On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:17:30PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > >>I am considering one of these cards, but thought is worth checking here >>first - particularly as the ata(4) doco does *not* list the chip >>(PDC20621) as supported (last supported chip in that range is PDC20620). >> >>However, src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c includes this chip (reading src >>from 5.4-RELEASE). >> >>I would be interested to know if anyone has tried one out, or knows for >>sure whether of not they are supported (and what does and does not work >>- e.g. RAID5?). >> >> >> > >ata-chipset.c is authoritative in case. The manpage is up to date in >CURRENT and will soon be updated in RELENG_6 and RELENG_5. > >- Christian > --------------080706050203010305000906--