From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 17:20:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FA35CC for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mva@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCD08FC12 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.182.121.134] (helo=localhost) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1TZPaJ-0002dO-I2 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:20:07 +0100 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:20:08 +0100 From: Marcus von Appen To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is PR database updated? Message-ID: <20121116172008.GA2179@medusa.sysfault.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20121116073700.GA2313@lonesome.com> <20121116112141.Horde.B6FLFdjz9kRQphO1svH0ctA@webmail.df.eu> <50A65A13.2010003@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A65A13.2010003@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Df-Sender: MTEyNTc0Mg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marcus von Appen List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:20:15 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On, Fri Nov 16, 2012, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Eitan Adler wrote: > [...] > > >> Wouldn't it make sense to add that information temporarily to the > >> GNATS-Webpage(s), > >> so we avoid further confusion and requests? Or is the problem fixed in the > >> next > >> few hours? :-) > > > > see freebsd.org right under "learn more". > > Well hidden important message. Not really hidden, but not an eye-catcher either. I've mistaken that block for the content belonging to "Based on BSD UNIX". This really, really should be fixed/changed, so such information is easier to find. Cheers Marcus --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCmdcgACgkQi68/ErJnpkfElwCfa3PKaJJPg+4wFZnWyilm6KQ3 5F0An3scvEMCmooDhuCvHrrvw+ECsyj7 =7Ru/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--