From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 07:30:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C4B16A4CF; Mon, 3 May 2004 07:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3b.sentex.ca (smtp3b.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0833F43D49; Mon, 3 May 2004 07:30:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from avscan1.sentex.ca (avscan1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.11]) by smtp3b.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i43EUcVs087536; Mon, 3 May 2004 10:30:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by avscan1.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i43EUc3x062400; Mon, 3 May 2004 10:30:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i43EUbiU089324; Mon, 3 May 2004 10:30:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.0.20040503103007.066bfff0@64.7.153.2> X-Sender: mdtpop@64.7.153.2 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 10:32:21 -0400 To: Scott Long From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <40965696.4030505@freebsd.org> References: <40965292.2040608@freebsd.org> <6.0.3.0.0.20040503101628.0831adb8@64.7.153.2> <40965696.4030505@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: Vinod Kashyap cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for 3ware driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 14:30:39 -0000 At 10:26 AM 03/05/2004, Scott Long wrote: >The bugs were introduced into 4.x with the vendor update that happened >on April 7. So far the only cards that we have tested against have been >6xxx series cards. The bugs deal with resource shortage handling, so >it's likely that the slower 6xxx cards are more likely than the newer >cards to experience the problems. However, on a fast machine under >heavy I/O load, I would expect it to happen on any card. OK, I have a few machines on my work bench that I am happy to punish without worry for data loss. Is there a script that can be run to re-create the problem ? i.e. so I can test before and after ? ---Mike