Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:59:40 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] ng_ipfw: node to glue together ipfw(4) and netgraph(4) Message-ID: <20050118225940.GA31663@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <41ED8D63.8090205@elischer.org> References: <20050117200610.GA90866@cell.sick.ru> <20050118183558.GA15150@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <41ED8D63.8090205@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 02:27:47PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >=20 > Looks good but I'm not convinced that it needs a whole new keyword of > we tap in through the divert mechanism. FWIW, keywords are very cheap and generally quite clean in ipfw2. I'd be more concerned in ipfw1. -- Brooks --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB7ZTbXY6L6fI4GtQRAsqNAJ0TRSokXVosZRrdYcpjj5kvf5IO0wCePJMA gOYqFLchzlOuvNrWr8Ro8zM= =5sTQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050118225940.GA31663>