From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 19 3:39:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F50315034 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 03:39:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id UAA02045; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 20:39:26 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <36F2245F.497A719D@newsguy.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 19:18:07 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zach Heilig Cc: Brett Taylor , Jonathan Frazier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: Problems building 3.1-STABLE References: <36F13794.8F1A07AB@newsguy.com> <19990318151255.B39713@znh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Zach Heilig wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 1999 at 02:27:48AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > > This is most likely an artifact of a bad interaction between doscmd, > > re-enabled in stable recently, and the upgrade target. > > I'll make the bet that /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.* are a.out ... An > UPGRADING variable could be defined, and something similar to: > > [in /usr/src/usr.bin/doscmd/Makefile, line 29] > -.if exists(${X11BASE}/include) && exists(${XLIBDIR}/libX11.a) > +.if exists(${X11BASE}/include) && exists(${XLIBDIR}/libX11.a) && !defined(UPGRADING) > > done... Excuse me, but DOSCMD was enabled because it's dependency on X11 was supposed to have been removed. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "What happened?" "It moved, sir!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message