From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 6 22:31:54 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA05729 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 6 May 1995 22:31:54 -0700 Received: from winky (winky.reno.nv.us [140.174.194.250]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA05723 for ; Sat, 6 May 1995 22:31:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winky (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA02008 for ; Sat, 6 May 1995 22:24:49 -0700 Message-Id: <199505070524.WAA02008@winky> X-Authentication-Warning: winky.reno.nv.us: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mgetty and ppd (problem solved) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 May 1995 11:29:11 PDT." Date: Sat, 06 May 1995 22:24:45 -0700 From: Eric Blood Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I'm trying to setup mgetty. The problem is pppd (I look forward >to giving ijj ppp a try) can't dial out because it says the device >is in use. There are no locks in /var/spool/lock, but both >/dev/ttyd1 and /dev/cuaa1 are owned by uucp. Mgetty is configured >in /etc/ttys to be on /dev/ttyd1 and ppd has been using /dev/cuaa1 >for the past couple of months. Is this the correct orientation (ie >is mgetty supposed to be using /dev/ttyd1 and ppd /dev/cuaa1 or the >other way around)? I just needed to make pppd use locks. EVB