Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 12:25:45 +0100 From: Martin Welk <mw@theatre.sax.de> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: death <death@southcom.com.au>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.6 & broken TCP_NODELAY option Message-ID: <19991219122545.D1081@theatre.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912180207480.12109-100000@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 02:10:30AM -0800 References: <19991217222754.E46333@theatre.sax.de> <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912180207480.12109-100000@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 02:10:30AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> It's upsetting that even though we had people from the Samba team
> speaking at FreeBSD'con, they aren't making samba run as best it can
> under FreeBSD without obtuse hacks or socket options.
It's also upsetting that this hasn't found it's way in the FreeBSD port
of Samba. I haven't asked yet on any mailing lists for disadvantages of
these options (at least, some more memory in use), but when looking for
a solution to make Samba work faster on FreeBSD, I found hints to those
socket options but none why they aren't default.
Okay, I'll look for Samba contacts...
Regards,
Martin
--
/| /| | /| / ,,You know, there's a lot of opportunities,
/ |/ | artin |/ |/ elk if you're knowing to take them,
you know, there's a lot of opportunities,
Freiberg/Saxony, Germany if there aren't you can make them,
mw@sax.de / mw@theatre.sax.de make or break them!'' (Tennant/Lowe)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991219122545.D1081>