From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 27 12:23:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16A5106566C for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varga.michal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786218FC13 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so2695594bwz.13 for ; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 04:23:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cNc/Fq5Stfu/I+N6598xxGoegCy0aCJmgXY42hG+JvQ=; b=RkGTAv3CZLPHFB85QVFkfBHGFmapoDv6Xyb1JwRTrJllKjm6S/g9UUil/skTS/d27E 5YICQlYG5yBGLkZB3sD26IjIoNDJiMuyAgS+C38vstkADRhbzAy7tXaskWtGseF4h3S4 yreeE1p+odLQM2mUfl5N0+lChV0uOSLj+wqPQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=M2SaV/bGQ4WfDsGPBhMkqe1UhsDZgS/JY0E7TakwI6pMAqCei4y2Mpfl1BuWOOTscp 9e/BB/DqdLmE7JGf4VheEmWHwSVurBGUJusppn4FfOP6RSCdBF7o30ApqQQN4SW47oS9 VZQcjuCuczYw6sbNKM81h4FHxlOFd1Y0igKOg= Received: by 10.204.123.141 with SMTP id p13mr2876026bkr.189.1290860618661; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 04:23:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.101.2] (73.44.broadband10.iol.cz [90.177.44.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g8sm953803bkg.23.2010.11.27.04.23.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 04:23:37 -0800 (PST) From: Michal Varga To: Rick In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Stonehenge Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1290860615.1478.15.camel@xenon> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnome2-lite and epiphany X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:23:41 -0000 On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 09:55 -0500, Rick wrote: > I wonder why epiphany is included in the gnome2-lite meta-port. Because it's the cleanest, lightest and bestest web browser ever created (well at least since Galeon died). > With dependencies, it takes a long time to build, You mean one dependency - webkit, which is nowadays considered THE killer web engine of the decade, quickly replacing Gecko wherever possible. Now if you were arguing for removal of yelp with its horrible dependency on that security nightmare called libxul[runner], that would be an entirely different case. > and I doubt many people use it. Within the circle of my close friends, I know 1 (that is - one, but let's say two, as I don't tend to check such things regularly) person that doesn't use epiphany. Where does that put me? > I noticed that neither fedora nor ubuntu include epiphany in > the install. In opposite to 50 other linux distributions that do. > If most people agree, could epiphany be removed from > gnome2-lite? No. (should I start collecting signatures, just in case?) m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account)