From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  5 15:52:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D5FE816A4CE; Mon,  5 Jan 2004 15:52:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5993243D5F; Mon,  5 Jan 2004 15:52:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i05NqLET042324;
	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:52:21 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:52:17 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20040105.165217.102614629.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: ticso@cicely.de, ticso@cicely12.cicely.de
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040105234430.GC39786@cicely12.cicely.de>
References: <20040105.163345.129782176.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<20040105233941.GB39786@cicely12.cicely.de>
	<20040105234430.GC39786@cicely12.cicely.de>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Still IRQ routing problems with bridged devices.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 23:52:27 -0000

In message: <20040105234430.GC39786@cicely12.cicely.de>
            Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> writes:
: Too bad that ISA components have to be attached after PCI.

Yes.  But you have ordering issues no matter which order you attach
things :-(.  It would be nice if we could query the BIOS' notion of
'Legacy' vs 'PNP/PCI'.  If someone points me at how to do that...

Warner