From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jan 9 21:17:18 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA07201 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 21:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA07193 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 21:17:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA03077; Tue, 9 Jan 1996 21:06:47 -0800 To: John Polstra cc: dfr@render.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got GNU `dld' ported to FreeBSD? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jan 1996 13:12:18 PST." <199601092112.NAA14462@austin.polstra.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jan 1996 21:06:47 -0800 Message-ID: <3075.821250407@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > I can tell you how to do _almost_ what you want, and I bet it's close > enough. Is your kludge-tolerance control set fairly high? *click* *click* *click* - OK, boss. I have it set to 11! :) > executable dynamically-linked. You can get around this if you're > willing to have your executable "depend" on a tiny do-nothing shared > library. First create a file "tiny.c" that contains this: Whaddya know. It works! Now is there any chance of getting: > void a_real_kludge() { } Down below 8K? :-) I know, I know, I want everything.. :) Seriously though, this idea has potential - thanks! Jordan