From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Sep 25 04:30:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA17570 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:30:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA17553; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:30:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA28892; Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:31:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-current (a.out) failure for x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:23:08 PDT." <199809251123.EAA12148@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 04:31:35 -0700 Message-ID: <28889.906723095@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > There's no "new perl" that ports need to adopt -- Mark said the system > perl will behave exactly the same as lang/perl5 in terms of module > installation. OK, well, actually the problem is somewhat more straightforward here. In x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk/Makefile we find: MANPREFIX= ${PREFIX}/lib/perl5/${PERL_VERSION} Which clearly won't work when there's no /usr/local/lib/perl5/... on the system at all. What's the convention for module man pages like this? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message