From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 21 19:41:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA23686 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:41:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hemi.com (hemi.com [204.132.158.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA23676 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:41:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from mbarkah@localhost) by hemi.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id UAA29958; Wed, 21 Feb 1996 20:41:19 -0700 From: Ade Barkah Message-Id: <199602220341.UAA29958@hemi.com> Subject: Re: pop3 and blocked users To: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 20:41:19 -0700 (MST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199602201925.UAA07476@gvr.win.tue.nl> from "Guido van Rooij" at Feb 20, 96 08:25:43 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Shouldn't pop implementation check if users are having a shell not > listed in /etc/shells? Otherwise, blocked users will stil be able to > recieve mail.. Not if they're blocked by resetting their password to '*' or somesuch. -Ade -------------------------------------------------------------------- Inet: mbarkah@hemi.com - HEMISPHERE ONLINE - www: --------------------------------------------------------------------