From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 22 00:03:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FB41065670; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 00:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim.harris@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCE68FC14; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 00:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfw7 with SMTP id fw7so5877170vcb.13 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SMVEKlOVpCL7qlGrkxvmMusdUpXnCUpbSBvvq3JulAA=; b=bsx08kcfCRsLFdRgJlBmEXoWOD7imxTISUnr4o954PMQg9sHKL+u0rZJKVnhDTwvB0 bGe3Of9p1esl/frt3mwNUw/WH+2iZ2275i0tbGvumNWhFHNrYkU3jMVH4ubjIg94n/oS p+vo39NDmUM4yXlxpJb8SrdMmdaqaxO/ZPYA5xWrk2Y8NajXm9V9Uce2afHz/NWmbC7P TjjrsobvgcokY8YLlnGhY4L0TaP9ZqLRMXzcyBq8sKwjghtEXKke9gmRMbZ37BB/SxXM cCMEzNZEA3gVK1Wha6CoSmSFRkZdjuStzuK4etZAov934TnOMVbAjD04zblygxexEQWK sLqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.75.70 with SMTP id a6mr3221775vdw.5.1348272187820; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: jim.harris@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.249.135 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <505CE601.4070106@sentex.net> References: <505CC8EC.4030608@sentex.net> <505CE601.4070106@sentex.net> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 17:03:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: zcC8tpiXX_WZ4UY3J9tF0ndAb1c Message-ID: From: Jim Harris To: Mike Tancsa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , delphij@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tws bug ? (LSI SAS 9750) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 00:03:08 -0000 On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 9/21/2012 4:59 PM, Jim Harris wrote: > Thanks, that allows it to boot up now! > > pci2: on pcib2 > LSI 3ware device driver for SAS/SATA storage controllers, version: > 10.80.00.003 > tws0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem > 0xc2460000-0xc2463fff,0xc2400000-0xc243ffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 > tws0: Using MSI > tws0: Controller details: Model 9750-4i, 8 Phys, Firmware FH9X > 5.12.00.007, BIOS BE9X 5.11.00.006 > em0: port 0x5040-0x505f mem > 0xc2500000-0xc251ffff,0xc2570000-0xc2570fff irq 19 at device 25.0 on pci0 > . > then a lot of > . > (probe65:tws0:0:65:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > (probe65:tws0:0:65:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID > (probe65:tws0:0:65:0): Error 22, Unretryable error > (probe1:tws0:0:1:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > (probe1:tws0:0:1:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID > (probe1:tws0:0:1:0): Error 22, Unretryable error > (probe2:tws0:0:2:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > (probe2:tws0:0:2:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID > . > . > . > (probe63:tws0:0:63:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > (probe63:tws0:0:63:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID > (probe63:tws0:0:63:0): Error 22, Unretryable error > (probe64:tws0:0:64:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > (probe64:tws0:0:64:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID > (probe64:tws0:0:64:0): Error 22, Unretryable error These can be ignored. CAM is just telling you that there are no devices attached at these target IDs. > da0 at tws0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device > da0: 6000.000MB/s transfers > da0: 953654MB (1953083392 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 121573C) > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > SMP: AP CPU #4 Launched! > > > Any thoughts on msi vs no msi ? Time to run some stress tests. Its > certainly a fast little controller for the money! > Typically MSI is preferred to INTx for performance reasons. I can't speak for why the original author made INTx the default though. Regards, -Jim