From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 16:12:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054DA1065676; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:12:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF2C8FC12; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5BGCnl7031503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:12:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q5BGCnl7031503 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1339431170; bh=dK3qnk1QJLhh7DIoCppXxgzQ+DxW6XSpHAZ948rDMYc=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=QjSNuD0KC/s2qZGDbLBZeSU3/53We4SpeMoHnqjj8u14TO/3iJPzVvcvaWqtEhGC6 dhxmBTJH1iIxk8/Xb1tHtzBKCxG18a7smIcFseCsYi+rKvzL9eDNLqyVj2O+YJoy8A JUsQabsi8GG2EQrQVcTSjnwVMggStGccKTkoOhQ0= Message-ID: <4FD61901.3010503@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:12:49 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120601 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD591DF.3060808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611103221.GU60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5D7B8.9080504@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611115529.GV60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5EFE1.30200@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611153614.GA60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20120611153704.GB60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD6136A.60704@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120611160545.GC60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20120611160545.GC60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_ALL,DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:12:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/06/2012 17:05, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:48:58PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 11/06/2012 16:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>> This patch does the trick, I'm now running a script with that patch = on to >>>>> discovers all the uniquename names which are not really uniq >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Bapt >>> >>> Here is the patch :) http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/realuniq.diff >> >> Aren't you going to initialise PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX anywhere? > No need except ports willing to have a custom PKGNAMEPREFIX but still w= anted to > have a custom prefix anyway. >=20 > like=20 > PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} > PKGUNIQUEPREFIX=3D py- >=20 > which is not mandatory but can help avoiding UNIQUENAME collision Not PREFIX --- SUFFIX. You have: UNIQUENAME?=3D ${PKGUNIQUENAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME}${PKGUNIQUENAMESUFFIX} ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ or is this part of some cunning plan to do with sub-ports? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/WGQEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyrrgCffIxSXZfHkjN9z3Car/nGTLcM tKUAn1fbjqCvKeilzj0cOD5oM5gMnBIa =Kux+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig01E6E61A30564A671BFE1F32--