Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:39:31 -0500 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform Message-ID: <20111118083931.12bf0500@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:48:49 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com articulated: > Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > > Even disregarding RFC3513, is an IPv6-enabled kernel without an IPv6 > address on lo0 a realistic configuration for a "real" FreeBSD system? > If not, I'd think it worthwhile to make pointyhat more realistic. > (Either way, it seems unobjectionable to improve the robustness of > postfix, making it more liberal in what it accepts.) > > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to > > touch pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all > > that...) > > It may be a bit late in the 9.0 release cycle to be messing with the > pointyhat configuration, but an adjustment might be considered after > 9.0-RELEASE is done. "postfix-current" -- 2.9.20111012,4 has been unmarked BROKEN on amd64 and builds without incident. I hope the actual current version, ie postfix-2.9-20111117.tar.gz will be in the ports system soon. I would like to thank Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> for his efforts in getting this valuable port problem corrected. Interestingly enough, and I cannot prove it to anyone's satisfaction, but I did mention to a colleague that if I posted on the ports forum regrading this problem and could get Wietse involved, the problem would be corrected within 24 hours. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111118083931.12bf0500>