From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 18 13:39:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AE41065678 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7318FC19 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghbg20 with SMTP id g20so582493ghb.13 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.181.234 with SMTP id l70mr4831372yhm.49.1321623574954; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d63sm943259yhl.10.2011.11.18.05.39.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3SlL5v5kg0z2CG4m for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:39:31 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 08:39:31 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20111118083931.12bf0500@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <3SkrRf563xzk2RT@spike.porcupine.org> <1321560805.6735.15.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4ec64621.5VnWOe6lq5n/i0BQ%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:39:36 -0000 On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:48:49 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com articulated: > Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0, > > but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0. > > Even disregarding RFC3513, is an IPv6-enabled kernel without an IPv6 > address on lo0 a realistic configuration for a "real" FreeBSD system? > If not, I'd think it worthwhile to make pointyhat more realistic. > (Either way, it seems unobjectionable to improve the robustness of > postfix, making it more liberal in what it accepts.) > > > Changing the jail configuration is possible but if a reasonable > > workaround can be made in postfix-current port I'd prefer not to > > touch pointyhat configuration (unexpected consequences and all > > that...) > > It may be a bit late in the 9.0 release cycle to be messing with the > pointyhat configuration, but an adjustment might be considered after > 9.0-RELEASE is done. "postfix-current" -- 2.9.20111012,4 has been unmarked BROKEN on amd64 and builds without incident. I hope the actual current version, ie postfix-2.9-20111117.tar.gz will be in the ports system soon. I would like to thank Sahil Tandon for his efforts in getting this valuable port problem corrected. Interestingly enough, and I cannot prove it to anyone's satisfaction, but I did mention to a colleague that if I posted on the ports forum regrading this problem and could get Wietse involved, the problem would be corrected within 24 hours. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________