From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 11 21:53:13 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC89516A41C
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:53:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu)
Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D25D43D4C
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:53:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu)
Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28])
	by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AE4388EF8
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:53:13 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:53:12 -0500
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <0C6FFEC6D70851EE1D851B5D@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
In-Reply-To: <42D2E67D.6080300@scls.lib.wi.us>
References: <6F436878DA63CD3A490BA30A@[10.110.3.244]>
	<42D2E2F4.3020704@dial.pipex.com> <42D2E67D.6080300@scls.lib.wi.us>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Mouse problem solved???
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:53:13 -0000

--On Monday, July 11, 2005 16:37:01 -0500 Greg Barniskis 
<nalists@scls.lib.wi.us> wrote:

> Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
>> Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>
>>> I still need to know if it's OK to use portupgrade to upgrade
>>> gnome-related ports after upgrading to gnome2.10 using gnome_upgrade.sh.
>>
>>
>> I think if it wasn't OK then UPDATING would have said so.
>> gnome_upgrade.sh seems to have been specifically because of a major leap
>> in revision numbers (and presumably underlying libraries) in gnome.
>
> That was my impression too -- that the upgrade script was only required
> for going from 2.8 to 2.10.
>
>  From the FAQ at http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html :
>>
>> 6. How do I keep my GNOME 2.10 components and applications up-to-date?
>>
>> You are emphatically encouraged to use portupgrade -- and only
>> portupgrade -- to keep your GNOME 2.10 components and applications
>> up-to-date.
>
> One would hope that if the answer ever changed, the FAQ would also.
>
Thanks - to both of you.  I'm upgrading now.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/