From owner-freebsd-current Thu Aug 2 12:39:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from arb.arb.za.net (arb.arb.za.net [196.7.148.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F5F37B403 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 12:39:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by arb.arb.za.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with UUCP id f72JckO80392; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 21:38:46 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (mark@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grimreaper.grondar.za (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f72D7dr07962; Thu, 2 Aug 2001 14:07:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200108021307.f72D7dr07962@grimreaper.grondar.za> To: Ollivier Robert Cc: "FreeBSD Current Users' list" Subject: Re: ntpd 4.1 References: <20010802122513.C89868@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> In-Reply-To: <20010802122513.C89868@caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr> ; from Ollivier Robert "Thu, 02 Aug 2001 12:25:13 +0200." Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:07:38 +0100 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > soon. :-) :-) :-) > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component. > > I'm a bit reluctant to force openssl for just ntpd. Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message