From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Mar 16 17:07:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA04520 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:07:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sag.space.lockheed.com (sag.space.lockheed.com [192.68.162.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA04512 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:07:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from handy@sag.space.lockheed.com) Received: from localhost by sag.space.lockheed.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/21Nov95-0423PM) id AA19877; Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:05:47 -0800 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 17:05:47 -0800 (PST) From: Brian Handy To: Tim Vanderhoek Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Ports , Brett Taylor Subject: Re: AfterStep 1.4.? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Files: The truth is out there Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >> [Where the @#$%^ is the AS-1.4.4 port?] > >Well, the sooner you submit an update of the port to jfitz, and >remind him to submit the necessary patches to the AfterStep >maintainer, the sooner the latest version will be available in >the ports system. :) Before you get your panties bound up too tight over this I think Brett Taylor is already on this mission. I did the 1.4.0 port and hated every second of it. According to Brett they've removed all the linux-centric cruft, fixed a few outstanding problems, changed some other things and it works pretty well now. If we apply enough pressure maybe he'll drop everything else and do the port! :-) Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message