From owner-freebsd-current Fri Oct 3 12:52:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA08912 for current-outgoing; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 12:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veda.is (adam@veda.is [193.4.230.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA08886 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 12:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from adam@localhost) by veda.is (8.8.7/8.8.5) id TAA19556; Fri, 3 Oct 1997 19:52:00 GMT Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 19:52:00 GMT From: Adam David Message-Id: <199710031952.TAA19556@veda.is> To: ortmann@sparc.ISl.NET (Daniel Ortmann) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw outputs 0's with default numbering References: <199709151623.LAA01132@watcher.isl.net> X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #2 (NOV) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >ipfw -f flush >ipfw add 1000 pass all from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 >ipfw add pass all from ${ip} to ${net}:${mask} >Then I get output as follows ... >Flushed all rules. >01000 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 >00000 allow ip from 199.3.25.128 to 199.3.25.0/24 >But "ipfw list" shows the following ... >01000 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 >01100 allow ip from 199.3.25.128 to 199.3.25.0/24 >I expected to see the real sequence numbers instead of just 0's. Is the 0000 intended to show that the rule is inserted according to automatic numbering, or would it be better to intend that the actual number assigned gets displayed? -- Adam David