From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 15:09:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F0316A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0258F43D46 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:09:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) Received: from mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.18]) by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C2630856; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) by mail-in-06-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24194124594; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (dsl-082-083-044-241.arcor-ip.net [82.83.44.241]) by mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E742B6F8; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kiste.my.domain (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j6SF9O0M065543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lofi@freebsd.org) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:09:19 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <8C64A123AF5094DE468F863D@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Face: =Ym$`&q\+S2X$4`X%x%6"L4>Y,$]<":'L%c9"#7#`2tb&E&wsN31on!N\)3BD[g<=?utf-8?q?=2EjnfV=5B=0A=093=23?=>XchLK,o; >bD>c:]^; :>0>vyZ.X[,63GW`&M>}nYnr]-Fp``,[[@lJ!QL|sfW!s)=?utf-8?q?A2!*=0A=09vNkB/=7CL-?=>&QdSbQg X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: Paul Schmehl Subject: Re: Question about maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:09:30 -0000 --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 28. July 2005 16:43, Paul Schmehl wrote: > OK. I see that tcl (83,84), itcl, itk and iwidgets are all without > maintainers. Does that mean the ports are maintained by freebsd folks? = Or > not maintained at all? Not maintained at all. This is the charme of tcl/tk at work here, the black= =20 magic that it is makes nobody want to make a commitment to the stuff. :-) In the past, every once in a while somebody has submitted/committed an upda= te=20 here or there, but nobody ever picked up maintainership. You can check out= =20 who submitted/committed what in FreeBSD's cvsweb. However, tcl83/84, itk, itcl and iwidgets are a pretty broad base. You migh= t=20 want to get a clearer idea first where the problem is located before you go= =20 sending out questions to people. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6PUjXhc68WspdLARAjTtAKCTH/18Wjoad/yPu8NWxr35w6k0SgCgqFh+ 7LkyGq4geceq1nkz9sdTFjA= =TPpf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1660206.EVM8zoQqqz--