From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 27 08:00:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA05596 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA05557 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 08:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id HAA12188 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.6/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA04921; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 08:58:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199609271458.IAA04921@rover.village.org> To: Jaye Mathisen Subject: Re: Weirdness with routing to freefall. Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 27 Sep 1996 05:46:25 PDT." References: Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 08:58:30 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message Jaye Mathisen writes: : Well, I don't know that I have too much to add to this discussion, : although a traceroute to freefall was mildly amusing. : My old connection to Sprint via Anaheim was much shorter. I'm on the SPRINTLINK outage mailing list. The problem is that there is a T-1 between sprint and CIX, which services CRL. This T1 is so overloaded that the routing update messages aren't getting through, so all of sprintlink thinks that the link has gone done and returns Host unreachables once you hit the internal core of sprintlink. There is no eta for correction of this problem. :-( Warner